: She described the concept of multiple genders as "demonic" and a "lie" being pushed on society.
You can read the text of the essay through interactive features provided by the New York Times or Yahoo News .
: The instructor gave the essay a 0/25, noting that it failed to use empirical evidence as required for a scientific class and contained offensive content.
: She argued that moving away from traditional gender norms "pulls us farther from God's original plans for humans" and that God intentionally created biological differences.
The 650-word paper was a reaction to an article about societal gender norms. Instead of using empirical evidence, Fulnecky used religious arguments and personal beliefs:
1655974190830mp4
: She described the concept of multiple genders as "demonic" and a "lie" being pushed on society.
You can read the text of the essay through interactive features provided by the New York Times or Yahoo News . 1655974190830mp4
: The instructor gave the essay a 0/25, noting that it failed to use empirical evidence as required for a scientific class and contained offensive content. : She described the concept of multiple genders
: She argued that moving away from traditional gender norms "pulls us farther from God's original plans for humans" and that God intentionally created biological differences. 1655974190830mp4
The 650-word paper was a reaction to an article about societal gender norms. Instead of using empirical evidence, Fulnecky used religious arguments and personal beliefs: