Below is a blog post drafted for a healthcare or professional screening audience.
One of the most valuable aspects of the 2016 report is its identification of "recurring themes" in non-submission or partial submission of data. While the program has seen high levels of engagement, certain administrative and technical hurdles continue to impact the completeness of the national dataset. Key areas highlighted include: Anomaly (2016)
Measuring local providers against rigorous national safety and accuracy metrics . Below is a blog post drafted for a
Identifying regions that may need additional support or training to meet these benchmarks. Looking Ahead Guidelines for sonographers based on the 2016 standards
from the 2016 FASP report (e.g., detection rates for specific conditions). Guidelines for sonographers based on the 2016 standards.
Information on since 2016.
Ensuring every screening event is recorded accurately to provide a true national picture.