It acts as a critique of how "authority" is determined in academic and public spheres. To help you further, would you like:
A summary of the specific regarding a particular philosopher (e.g., Lacan or Deleuze)? The counter-arguments or responses from postmodern critics? More details on the Sokal hoax article itself? EU-E-Law, Lao Tzu and Law Teachers in the CT Age - BILETA
The book aims to defend "rationality" and scientific standards against what they view as a relativistic, "anything goes" approach to knowledge. 2. Targets of the Critique Intellectual Impostures: postmodern philosopher...
Critiqued for applying poetic language to mathematical theory.
Intellectual Impostures (published as Fashionable Nonsense in the US) is a 1998 book by physicists Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont that critiques the use of scientific concepts and terminology by several prominent French postmodernist philosophers. 1. Core Purpose and Argument It acts as a critique of how "authority"
Sokal and Bricmont aimed to demonstrate that several prominent intellectuals abused scientific concepts (from physics, mathematics, and biology) by using them out of context, inaccurately, or as meaningless metaphors.
Critiqued for misuse of mathematical concepts like topology. More details on the Sokal hoax article itself
The authors specifically state they are not criticizing all philosophy, but rather the specific "abuse" of scientific terminology.